History has always appealed to me on so many levels. Time to me is simply a human concept, one that makes this absurd universe a bit more tangible. I see it an a realm that connects us all, yet we make sense of it through clocks. So when given the prompt of picking an event that occurred through history, I quickly decided on the crimes of humanity against the Native Americans. I wanted to reach through time, hear the stories and understand their perspective. It's a deeply complicated series of event, and I wanted to dive deeply into it's torn roots. The main framework of my question asked if what took place against the Native American's were a genocide. I approached this on a cultural, physical and spiritual level. It broke my heart.
I find myself to be a very sensitive human being to the injustices of the universe. Thus, this project crushed my soul in so many ways. Researching the atrocities that were brought upon this select group of people became too much at many points. I felt like being an American, a human even, somehow linked my hands to these events. It honestly killed me. My eyes got lost in the hazy screen of my laptop as I read and reread stories of pain, stories from children who walked thousands of miles or were sent to schools where their roots were stolen from them. And that was the most challenging part. Reading words upon words of injustice and knowing I could not reach through the screen and save them. I know that this may just be a grade for some people, that joining honors looks good on their college resume, but diving into things like these is one of the constant waves in my life. There were many changes I made throughout the course of my project. One that I found to be most substantial was my perspective. When I entered this project, I was filled with a teenage angst towards the concept. I saw it in a dark, twisted light and could not comprehend any positivity. With the assistance of my guru (Ashley) I was able to change the lens through which I saw history. The events were tragic, there is absolutely no denying that. Now it's time for me to provide some words of wisdom to future Junior Honors. Forget letters, first of all. The point of honors is not for you to receive an A, it's not to impress future colleges, it's for personal growth. In this project, you are given the profound opportunity to dive through history, little one. That is something truly amazing. In many other countries, children would envy our right to knowledge, don't abuse it.
0 Comments
September. In my essay, The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail, Ashley gave me feedback as follows. My first major area of improvement was to embed my quotes. Instead of just dropping them in, I should provide context that helps the reader understand. Thus, my first writing goal is to follow a more basic guideline.
This also includes not getting too carried away in eloquent language that dilutes my message. I find myself getting caught up in the eloquence of what I am writing, the poetic justice of it to such an extent that it waters down my main ideas. My next goal in writing is to not use it as an escape. Though a great form of expression, I find myself only comfortable speaking through paper. I want to be able to freely speak and not rely so intensely on writing. This is my second goal, and I hope to find my voice, both on paper and in reality Equality is a word that the United States promises equality for all, yet forgets animals are living, emotional creatures as well. Thus we must extend this principle it to all beings on this planet and illegalize animal testing. I picked an animal issue for a specific reason. I am a strong activist of human rights, and found a lot of the issues my peers chose to be very heavy on my heart. However, animals are not represented in our court systems, they cannot explain that they do not want their children killed. Humans can speak for themselves to a degree, we can alter our laws to protect one anothers liberty, but for animals I believe they are extremely underrepresented. I wanted to fight for the minority whose most burdened with injustice on our planet. Through this project I found the facts necessary to back up my emotional argument, and found a way to get my foot in the door to spark change on a local level. Through this project, the most significant advice I took away was from my amazing teacher Ashley. Though I am just a drop of water, what is the ocean but a multitude of drops? Basically, that my individual actions make a difference, and the worlds problems do not have to be burdened just upon my shoulders.
My first draft of the op-ed exceeded 1700 words, and my content was a scattered mess of complex language and emotions. Because I am so passionate about this issue, I allowed my emotional mindset to run the entire piece. But after critically reading through it without being attached, I saw great areas of improvement and incorporated stronger philosophies, facts and credible sources into my argument which strengthened my logos and ethos. A pathos mindset came easily to me, and this project helped me learn to deattatch myself from the worlds problems and not take them all on in one moment of my infinity. I cultivated the skill of not loosing my reader in a factual article trying to twist it with a poetic justice, weaving in metaphors. Instead of creating a beautiful art piece I decided to take action, because my conscience couldn't stand anything less. In the project, The Morality's of Justice, I explored what was the best way the United States government could respond to the issue of animal testing. I embedded my mind, body and soul into creating my own herbal lotions etc. I actually brought some to the exhibition to show people there are so many other options besides using the cheap name brand products. I also created a petition and got a significant amount of signatures that I will actually be discussing with City Council. I am also hosting a meeting with local companies to urge them to only buy quality, cruelty free products as they are the heart of Durango and should provide merchandise that has clean history. I showcased heartbreaking pictures and provided the public with lists of companies that test on animals and common procedures. People were shocked, some every cried and couldn't believe all the atrocities that went on. My action piece was designed to bring together a community in act of protest to the multi billion dollar corporations that are taking hold of innocent animals lives and the shelves in our kitchens. I believe this project showcases my strengths because it displayed my passion and desire to speak for those who cannot. I transcended my parties views, my mothers views, and showed the just course of action for the world to take. I am, a sensitive, analytical person. I remember after putting up my petition. The feeling I got after every single signature made my heart smile. However, a few students thought of my project as a joke, and wrote crude comments about animal testing as well as me. It hurt, and I had to use white out quite a few times in one day. I cried for awhile over it, and took the words to heart because I had spent so much time working on this. But I had an epiphany and realized that there are always going to be individuals trying to pull me down, but no one can make me feel inferior unless I give them my consent. Looking back on all the people who did sign it, who wanted to make a difference, that was what I focused on for the rest of the day. Throughout my life, I have dived deep into the injustices of the world, wanting to save the suppressed but finding I myself drowned in their tears. The world scares me, all of the wrongdoings, all of the pain. Sometimes I can't handle it and just explode into a million pieces, feeling each scar of other individuals. This project was the first step I have taken in a long time to deattatch my emotional well being from others. And its hard, believe me it's so hard. Because I want to save everyone from their pain, but this project made me realize I can still be an activist while not jeopardizing my mental health. Watching the videos online, I felt the scientists blood on my hands, guilty by association, guilty by my species. I often take on everyone elses wrongdoings, my entire species and as a result become very paranoid, loosing my identity and thinking I am the killers and the murderers because we trace back to the same roots. Ashley, I know you're reading this, and I just want to thank you for making me feel like I am one of the good ones. That I am not tainted because of our species past. You're a good one too. Testing our Humanity
Albert Einstein once stated, “Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.” Life is a precious thing, thus minimizing pain and maximizing happiness is a universal truth. This applies to all species on this Earth. However, a mindset called speciesism has dominated the world. Within our own species war has broken out against those defenseless. We condemn sexism and racism, yet our entire infrastructure and society is built upon animals suffering. Equality is a word that the United States promises for all, yet forgets animals are living, emotional creatures as well. Thus we must extend this principle it to all beings on this planet and illegalize animal testing. Adverting the facts we’d rather not hear is perhaps to ease a burdened conscience that has been tainted over the years. Let me bluntly state what is ignored. Not only is the suffering inflicted on these animals vulgar, but 12 million of tax funded dollars supports the veins of it every year. AAVS.org provided this information on the article, “How Animals are Used,” and explains some of the most often practiced procedures. Eye irritancy often involves rabbits that are restrained while an extremely painful chemical descends into one eye. They are evaluated and restrained for up to seven days, while the acidic chemical burns their eyes. Mutagenicity is the vulgar experimentation in which animals, often mice are given a mutation that literally changes their chemical makeup, for example cancer. They are forced to go through the same pain a human cancer patient would, and are then killed often without anesthetic and dissected. Not only is it unsuccessful, but alternatives such as cell toxicology which harm no one have a success rate of 80% to 95% according to PETA would be a much stronger alternative to fighting diseases. We look upon human cancer patients with sorrow but give their diseases to other creatures. The emotional connection of giving birth exists in any species. Humans or lab rats. In reproductive toxicity, subjects are given large doses of toxic chemicals. While preparing to bring their offspring into the world, they are dying from this virulent chemical. Just before birth, they are killed. Their fetuses are ripped apart and examined, along with their newly born offspring. The last extremely inhumane practice is ecotoxicity. The victim is often fish and their environment is invaded by toxic fumes, a practice comparable to gas chambers. After a 96 hour period, half of them die at a lethal dose. Though these experiments are obviously cruel and unthinkable to inflict on another human being, they’re performed on animals by the thousands until the desired effect is achieved. None of them are illegal or even regulated despite how cruel, irrelevant to human health or redundant they are. The priority is human benefit, which comes in many sinister shades of black. Human beings forget to extend humanity to species other than ourselves. The Animal Welfare Act is the only law in place that forces labs to use anesthetic and conduct somewhat ethical procedures. A shocking 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by this law. Meaning the labs can treat them in any grotesque way and perform excruciatingly painful procedures such as the ones listed above without anesthetic. For this reason, over 800 laboratories strictly use animals not defended and are never faced with regulations or ethics. Who protects them? Animal testing ethics were demolished by a man named Harry Harlow. Who bluntly said, “The only thing I care about is whether a monkey will turn out a property I can publish. I don’t have any love for them. How could you love a monkey? I just have no feeling for them—at all.” The Mad Scientist blog studies the history of scientists gone wrong. According to the page, Harlow created tests that subjected thousands of primates to psychological abuse. He was infamous for, “The Well of Despair.” The environment was an extremely small space closed off to any stimulus, light and interaction. For an entire year, these newborn monkeys only knew darkness are were torn apart from their mothers. Even the happiest monkeys showed signs of deep, psychological depression. He progressed this depression by making them become addicted to alcohol. He also forced monkeys to mate by using a rape rack. This resulted in the victimized mothers chewing off their child’s fingers and crushing their heads after the torture they were put through. The 20th century animal rights activist and Utilitarian philosopher, Peter Singer, stated in his book Practical Ethics that “The application of the principle of equality to the infliction of suffering is... fairly straightforward. Pain and suffering are bad and should be prevented or minimized, irrespective of the race, sex, or species of the being that suffers.. When we come to consider the value of life, we cannot say quite so confidently that a life is a life, and equally valuable, whether it is a human life or an animals.” How can we value one life over another? How is it justifiable to kill thousands of animals to produce one vaccine that has an extremely low probability of even helping the human population? Though we may share some genetic structure with species like primates, our systems still respond very differently to drugs. According to PETA, one of the leading movements for animal rights, “Nine out of ten experimental drugs fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies.” Despite this shocking truth, over 100 million animals are dissected, infected, injected, gassed, mutilated, radiated, tortured, burned, blinded and poisoned in a futile effort. A Utilitarianist point of view could come into place. Though many argue animal testing is necessary to maximize human welfare, it is extremely wasteful. Let’s break it down, past the technical labels of humans or animals that create an identity of chains. Every living, breathing organism on this planet is composed of energy. Though we manifest in different forms our framework is eternally linked. We all experience pain or fear and expanding Rawls Veil of Ignorance, the placement on this planet isn’t at our hands. We cannot determine our fate so those with more power must liberate the suppressed. Despite their gender, ethnicity, culture or species, every single piece of this planet deserves respect. Speciesism is synonymous with sexism and racism. Injustice is injustice despite the hue of paint it’s masked by. Sidenote, If this op ed inspired you to take action, I urge you that it can take place even in your own home. Below are links to PETA’s list of companies that do and do not test on animals. Change can begin with the smallest actions. Boycott these companies, fight for the silenced! Please, do not just read this op ed, allow it to tear you apart for a moment and then continue supporting this industry. Do not do the animals and I that injustice! Thank you for listening to me ramble, have an exceptional day. http://www.mediapeta.com/peta/PDF/companiesdonttest.pdf http://www.mediapeta.com/peta/PDF/companiesdotest.pdf |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2016
Categories |